:: Volume 5, Issue 3 (2-2017) ::
scds 2017, 5(3): 34-59 Back to browse issues page
Sociological analysis of emotional divorce among Noshahr’s spouse
Abstract:   (9114 Views)

 Over time relationships that lead to different demands, attitudes and needs of men and women and then away they are from each other. In the past, the divorce rate is quite significant and progressive process led to the neglect of other family crisis. Emotional Divorce is one of the serious damage that the most important factor in the rupture of the most fundamental structures of society namely the family. The present article seeks to emphasize the relationship of family dysfunction (disorder) to investigate the factors affecting on their emotional divorce in the city of Noshahr. The research method is a questionnaire survey and measurement. The population includes all married men and women in the city Noshahr. The sample size was estimated based on the sample of 390 people. Data were collected by using a questionnaire. The results showed that emotional divorce has a significant relationship with lack of joint consultation, lack of common synchronization, lack of common well-being and lack of common violence. all of these variables as well as the structural model explained 57 percent of  alteration of the dependent variable (emotional divorce)

Keywords: Family, divorce, emotional divorce, social disorder
Full-Text [PDF 515 kb]   (11275 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research | Subject: Special
Received: 2016/07/5 | Accepted: 2017/07/3 | Published: 2017/07/3
References
21. 21.Axnin, W. &Gand,A.T. (1992).The relationship between cohabitation and Divorce, Demography, 29,357-374.
22. 22.Bradbury ,T .(2000). Research on the nature and determinants of marital satisfaction: a decade in review .Journal of Marriage and Family, 62 (4), 964-980.
23. 23.Bennet,N.G.(1998)Commitment and modern ::::::::::::union::::::::::::, American sociological review,53,127-138.
24. 24.Bumpass l. & Lu.H. (2000). Trends in cohabitation and implication for children s family contexts in the United States: population studies. 54(1), 29-41.
25. 25.Clarkberg,m.(1995)Attitudes, Values and entrance into cohabitational versus, social forces, 74:609-634
26. 26.Fraley,C.R.Heffernan.M,E.(2013). Attachment and parental divorce:A test of the diffusion and sensitive period hypotheses.39, 1199-1213
27. 27.Good w.j.(1963)world revolution and family patterns, New York, Free Press.
28. 28.Gan-mette,B.&.KariSlining,R.(2014).Relationship dissatisfaction and other risk factors for future relationship dissolution: a population-based study of18523 couples.49,109-119
29. 29.Hakim c. (2000). work-lifestyle Changes in the 2ist century: Preference Theory, Oxford University Press.
30. 30.Markman, H. J., Stanley, S., & Blumberg, S. L. (1994).Fighting for your marriage: Positive steps for preventing divorce and preserving a lasting love. San Francisco, CA :Jossey-Bass
31. 31.Stalder Daniel R.(2011). The role of dissonance social comparison and marital status in thinking about divorce. 29: 302-323
32. 32.Sharmabharit.K. &.Gokalnagar. G.(2011).Mental and emotional impact of divorce on women.vol37.125-131
33. 33.Oppong c. (1993).Occupational and conjugal inequalities and insecurity: effects on family organization and size. In: Women's position and demographic change. Oxford, England, Clarendon Press, 339-59.
34. 34.Oppenheim, M, K. & Jensen.A.(1995) .Gender and family change in Industrialized Countries, Oxford: Clarendon Press.
35. 35.Wait l. j. (2005). marriage and family, international journal of middle studies 14:173-184


XML   Persian Abstract   Print



Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Volume 5, Issue 3 (2-2017) Back to browse issues page