|
|
|
 |
Search published articles |
 |
|
Showing 2 results for Critical Discourse Analysis
Sajad Babakhani, Akbar Salehi, Yahya Ghaedi, Sousan Keshavarz, Volume 8, Issue 1 (8-2019)
Abstract
The present research, in the framework of critical discourse analysis, examines the citizenship education in discourses after the Islamic Revolution. For this purpose, the texts and documents related to the category of citizenship education in the five periods mentioned by Norman Fairclough, It has been analyzed at three levels: "description of the text", "analyzing the processes of production and interpretation," and "social context explanation". the dominant discourse of citizen education is the discourse of the moral citizen-law-governor who accepts citizenship education centered on religion and Islamic law; any discourse with the rejection of previous discourse and agenda-setting and focusing the comments and policies that are targeted, strengthened and established its existence. the post-revolution discourse has not balanced all the categories and indicators of citizenship education. and the represented citizen in these discourses is one-dimensional inventory which in just each period, it has experienced rapid and uneven growth in one aspect. in most cases, the documents examined follow a single-discourse pattern and they are not interested in using elements of rival discourses.
Mr. Abbas Behnejad, Dr. Hamidreza Mostafid, Dr. Jawad Ala Al-Mohadesin, Volume 9, Issue 4 (3-2021)
Abstract
This paper attempts to report the intellectual of Mahmoud Abu Rayyah in Criticism of ḥadīth and ḥadīth's narrators, among Sunni Muslims as a social action which was formed under the influence of sociopolitical phenomena and the views of former thinkers; and caused reactions amongst posterities. The method used is 'Critical analysis of Discourse'. To achieve this goal, beside the social background which was caused by modern intellectualism in Egypt, the works of Abu Rayyah and his masters in Criticism of ḥadīth, have been surveyed and their similarities and differences have been tracked. Also, the reaction of his conformists and dissidents among the Sunni and Shia scholars has been reported.
|
|
|
|
|
|