[Home ] [Archive]   [ فارسی ]  
:: Main :: About :: Current Issue :: Archive :: Search :: Submit :: Contact ::
Main Menu
Journal Information::
Articles archive::
For Authors::
For Reviewers::
Contact us::
Site Facilities::
Search in website

Advanced Search
Receive site information
Enter your Email in the following box to receive the site news and information.
:: Volume 10, Issue 1 (8-2021) ::
scds 2021, 10(1): 44-82 Back to browse issues page
Factor Analysis of the Effective Social Factors on Sustainable Development, The City of Chabahar
Farahnaz Sardarzahi , Golamreza Miri
Master of Sociology, Islamic Azad University, Zahedan Branch
Abstract:   (919 Views)
The present study has attempted to explore the effective social factors (humanitarian factors) on sustainable development in four spectra including promoting, inhibitory, internal, and external factors among native inhabitants of the city of Chabahar. Nineteen indicators were studied in order to identify the main factors. Also a questionnaire containing 100 questions was distributed among 318 native inhabitants. The reliability value of the questionnaire was 0.75. Regarding data analysis, the KMO and Bartlett's test of sphericity were used for determining the adequacy and selection of proper data. Finally, thirteen factors and thirty nine items assessing the status of these factors among the native residents of Chabahar  were extracted and named as follows: the internal promoting social factors (four general indicators and two indicators specific to the people with work experience) resulting to the sum of the total varience equal to %73.341, including “social trust” (low) , “social participation” (intermediate), “interpersonal trust” (intermediate), “collective spirit” (high), and “job commitment” (intermediate); the internal inhibitory factors (sum of total varience equal to (%65.602) including “restricting women’s independence” (low), “religious fanaticism” (low), and “racial distinction” (relatively low); the external promoting factors (sum of total varience equal to  (%61.920) including “political freedom and social opportunities” (low), “justice-centeredness” (very low), and “ensure transparency” (low); the external inhibitory social factors (sum of total varience equal to (%59.784) including “inefficiency of rules” (high) and “ethnic discrimination” (high)
Keywords: Factor Analysis, Humanitarian Factors, Social Development, Sustainable Development.
Full-Text [PDF 1921 kb]   (138 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research | Subject: Special
Received: 2021/01/11 | Accepted: 2021/07/11 | Published: 2022/11/15
1. Alexander, J. Ruel (1997) Civil Societies, Sage publication, London.
2. Durana D.C, Gogana L.M, Artenea A, Duran V (2015) «The components of sustainable development - a possible approac». Procedia Economics and Finance. 26, 806–811.
3. Durana D.C, Gogana L.M, Artenea A, Duran V (2015) « The Objectives of Sustainable Development - Ways to Achieve Welfare». Procedia Economics and Finance, 26, 812–817.
4. Estes, R., (2001) «Social Welfare and Social Development: Partners or Competitors», University of Pennsylvania. Encyclopedia. Social Science, International Edition, vol. 7:61, 1972.
5. Inter-American Development (2003) Social Development Strategy Document, Washington, D. C.
6. Jakson, j and Michael, H. (1991) Physical education and sport. Sage publication
7. F.E.Jandt, (1995) Intercultural communication: An Introdoction, California State University.
8. Folger, Robert and Cropanzano, Russell (1998) Organizational Justice and Human Resource; sag publications.
9. Jollans N and Harmswors G (2007) «Participation of indigenous groups in sustainable development monitoring: Rationale and examples from New Zealand». Ecological Economics. 62, 716–726.
10. Loomis, T.M (2000) «Indigenous Populations and Sustainable Development: Building on Indigenous Approaches to Holistic», Self-Determined Development. 28, 893–910.
11. Nahapiet, J; Ghoshal, s (1998) «Social Capital, Intellectual Capital and the Organizational Advantage». Academy of Manamement Review, Vol 23, NO 2, p 242- 266.
12. Nancy, R., (2000) World Summiton Social Development, Economic Development and Social Responsibility, Geneva, Switzerland.
13. OECD (2001) strategies for sustainable development, The DAC guidelines.
14. Smith, David M., (1979) where the grass is greener living in an unequal world, Penguin Books.
15. Ware JE, Sherbourne CD. (1992) «The MOS 36 item short-form health survey (SF-36) ». Medical Care; 30: 83-473.
Send email to the article author

Add your comments about this article
Your username or Email:


XML   Persian Abstract   Print

Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Sardarzahi F, Miri G. Factor Analysis of the Effective Social Factors on Sustainable Development, The City of Chabahar. scds 2021; 10 (1) :44-82
URL: http://journals.sabz.ac.ir/scds/article-1-1274-en.html

Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Volume 10, Issue 1 (8-2021) Back to browse issues page
مجله علمی پژوهشی مطالعات توسعه اجتماعی فرهنگی Quarterly Journal of Socio - Cultural Development Studies
Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.05 seconds with 37 queries by YEKTAWEB 4652