[Home ] [Archive]   [ فارسی ]  
:: Main :: About :: Current Issue :: Archive :: Search :: Submit :: Contact ::
Main Menu
Journal Information::
Articles archive::
For Authors::
For Reviewers::
Contact us::
Site Facilities::
Search in website

Advanced Search
Receive site information
Enter your Email in the following box to receive the site news and information.
:: Volume 10, Issue 3 (12-2021) ::
scds 2021, 10(3): 173-192 Back to browse issues page
The Results of the Dictator Game among Divorced Children
Madjid Eshaghi Gordji , Abbas Mohammadi
PhD student, Faculty of Mathematics,Statistics and Computer Science,Semnan University
Abstract:   (541 Views)
Divorce and separation of parents are the main causes of mental illness in children. Therefore, it has been decided to examine the degree of fairness and justice of divorced children as one of these variables according to the following models and in the game the Dictator. Economic analysis is usually based on the assumption that people are completely interested in themselves and that they  are looking to increase their personal gain. But in some economic experiments, there are evidences and phenomena that can not be interpreted and explained based on self-interest. In this model, people have fair tendencies and are sensitive to unequal results. In this article, at first the children of divorce and their moral characteristics have been introduced, then the game the Dictator and the model of Fahr and Schmidt (1999) has been introduced and analyze. To check the correctness of this model and its results in the case of divorced children, a  two-person experiment in the form of a dictator game has been designed. This test was performed for male and female high school students in one of the cities of Iran. The results show that a significant proportion of divorced children choose between self-interest, between fairness and self-interest.
Keywords: The Game Dictator, Marriage, Divorce, Justice, Personal interest
Full-Text [PDF 1381 kb]   (97 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research | Subject: Special
Received: 2021/10/19 | Accepted: 2022/01/2 | Published: 2023/03/14
1. Andreoni, J & Bernheim , B.D (2009) «Social Image and the 50-50 Norm :A Theoretical and Experimental Analysis of Audience Effects», Econometrica,77(5):1607-1636.
2. Charness, G & Rabin, M (2002) «Understanding social preferences with simple tests» ,Quarterly journal of Economics: 817-869.
3. Fehr, E & Schmidt , K. M (1999) «A Theory of Fairness, Competition, and Cooperation» ,The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 114(3): 817-868.
4. Fehr , E & Fischbacher , U (2003) «The nature of human altruism»,Nature,425(6960): 785-791.
5. Fehr, E & Nacf, M & Schmidt , K. M (2006) «Inequality Aversion, Efficiency, and Maximin Preferences in Simple Distribution Experiments: Comment». The American Economic Review , 96(5): 1912-1917.
6. Guala , F (2005) The methodology of experimental economics, Cambridge University Press.
7. Fischbacher, U& Fong , C.M & Fehr, E (2009) «Fairness , errors and the power of competition » , Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization , 72(1): 527-545.
8. Bolton , G. F & Ockenfels . A (2000) ERC: «A Theory of Equity, Reciprocity , and Competition», The American Economic Review, 90(1):166-193.
9. Cappelen , A. W & Hole, A. D & Sorensen, E. Q & Tungodden. B (2007) «The Pluralism of Fairness Ideals: An Experimental Approach», American Economic Review, 97(3):818-827.
10. Engelmann, D & Strobel, M (2004) «Inequality Aversion , Efficiency. And Maximin Preferences in Simple Distribution Experiments», The American Economic Review, 94(4): 857-869.
11. Roth , A. E & Prasnikar, V & Okuno-Fujiwara, M & Zamir, S (1991) «Bargaining and Market Behavior in Jerusalem, Ljubljana, Pittsburgh, and Tokyo: An Experimental Study» , The American Economic Review, 81(5): 1068-1095.
12. Guth, W & Schmittberger, R & Schwarze, B (1982) «An experimental analysis of ultimatum bargaining» ,Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 3(4): 367-388.
13. Erci Rusmusen (2001) «Games and Information», New York Basil Black well.
14. Aumann R (1974) «Subjectivity and Correlation in Radnomized Strategies», Journal of Mathematical Economics 1:67-96.
15. Avinash Dixit & Susan Skeath (2004) «Game of Strategy», 2 Edition Norton.
16. Benoit ,J,P & Krishna ,V (1987) «Nash Equilibria of Finitely Rrpeated Game », International Journal of Game Theory , 16:197-204.
17. Bernheim ,B. D (1984) «Rationalizable Strategic Behavior», Econometrica 52: 1007-1028.
Send email to the article author

Add your comments about this article
Your username or Email:


XML   Persian Abstract   Print

Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Eshaghi Gordji M, Mohammadi A. The Results of the Dictator Game among Divorced Children. scds 2021; 10 (3) :173-192
URL: http://journals.sabz.ac.ir/scds/article-1-1484-en.html

Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Volume 10, Issue 3 (12-2021) Back to browse issues page
مجله علمی پژوهشی مطالعات توسعه اجتماعی فرهنگی Quarterly Journal of Socio - Cultural Development Studies
Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.05 seconds with 37 queries by YEKTAWEB 4642