[Home ] [Archive]   [ فارسی ]  
:: Main :: About :: Current Issue :: Archive :: Search :: Submit :: Contact ::
Main Menu
Home::
Journal Information::
Articles archive::
For Authors::
For Reviewers::
Registration::
Contact us::
Site Facilities::
::
Search in website

Advanced Search
..
Receive site information
Enter your Email in the following box to receive the site news and information.
..
:: Volume 6, Issue 2 (11-2017) ::
scds 2017, 6(2): 127-149 Back to browse issues page
The relationship between social networks and political participation with an emphasis on the role of mediator of political debate, political efficacy and political culture
Mahmoudreza Rahbarghazi , Somayeh Motamedi , Azam Shahriyari
political science
Abstract:   (6525 Views)

این تحقیق به بررسی ارتباط بین شبکه اجتماعی با دو نوع مشارکت سیاسی منفعلانه و فعالانه بر اساس مدل­ میانجی­ای می پردازد که در آن بحث سیاسی، اثربخشی سیاسی و فرهنگ سیاسی به عنوان متغیرهای میانجی درنظر گرفته شده­اند. جامعه مورد بررسی کلیه دانشجویان دانشگاه اصفهان می باشدکه از طریق روش نمونه گیری سهمیه­ای به تعداد 390 نفر انتخاب شدند. با تقسیم مشارکت سیاسی به دو نوع منفعلانه و فعالانه نتایج نشان داد در حالیکه مدت زمان عضویت در شبکه­های اجتماعی تاثیر منفی­ای بر روی بحث سیاسی و اثربخشی سیاسی می­گذارند، اما عمیق شدن فعالیت در شبکه­های اجتماعی و واقعی تلقی کردن محتوای شبکه­های اجتماعی با ایجاد تاثیرات مثبت بر روی افزایش بحث سیاسی، اثربخشی سیاسی و فرهنگ سیاسی باعث بهبود وضعیت مشارکت سیاسی فعالانه در جامعه می­شود. اما یافته­ها نشان می­دهد که مدل نظری پژوهش در مورد مشارکت منفعلانه(رای دادن در انتخابات) تایید نمی­شود.

Keywords: Social media, political discussion, political efficacy, political culture, political participation
Full-Text [PDF 669 kb]   (3846 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research | Subject: General
Received: 2017/04/13 | Published: 2017/11/15
References
1. Balkin, J. M. (2004). Digital speech and democratic culture: A theory of freedom of expression for the information society. NYUL rev., 79, 1.
2. Boulianne, S. (2009). Does Internet use affect engagement? A meta-analysis of research. Political communication, 26(2), 193-211.
3. Chan, M., & Guo, J. (2013). The role of political efficacy on the relationship between Facebook use and participatory behaviors: A comparative study of young American and Chinese adults. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 16(6), 460-463.
4. Chin, W. W. (1998). Overview of the PLS Method. Online available from http://discnt.cba.uh.edu/chin/PLSINTRO.HTM. 1-3
5. Cogburn, D. L., & Espinoza-Vasquez, F. K. (2011). From networked nominee to networked nation: Examining the impact of Web 2.0 and social media on political participation and civic engagement in the 2008 Obama campaign. Journal of Political Marketing, 10(1-2), 189-213.
6. Corrigall-Brown, C., & Wilkes, R. (2014). Media exposure and the engaged citizen: How the media shape political participation. The Social Science Journal, 51(3), 408-421.
7. Diamond, L. (1999). Developing democracy: Toward consolidation. JHU Press.
8. E. Pinkleton, Erica Weintraub Austin, B. (2001). Individual motivations, perceived media importance, and political disaffection. Political Communication, 18(3), 321-334.
9. E. Pinkleton, Erica Weintraub Austin, B. (2001). Individual motivations, perceived media importance, and political disaffection. Political Communication, 18(3), 321-334.
10. Gastil, J. (2000). By popular demand: Revitalizing representative democracy through deliberative elections. Univ of California Press.
11. Gil de Zúñiga, H., Molyneux, L., & Zheng, P. (2014). Social media, political expression, and political participation: Panel analysis of lagged and concurrent relationships. Journal of Communication, 64(4), 612-634.
12. Hardy, B. W., & Scheufele, D. A. (2005). Examining differential gains from Internet use: Comparing the moderating role of talk and online interactions. Journal of Communication, 55(1), 71-84.
13. Holt, K., Shehata, A., Strömbäck, J., & Ljungberg, E. (2013). Age and the effects of news media attention and social media use on political interest and participation: Do social media function as leveller?. European Journal of Communication, 28(1), 19-34.
14. Kenski, K., & Stroud, N. J. (2006). Connections between Internet use and political efficacy, knowledge, and participation. Journal of broadcasting & electronic media, 50(2), 173-192.
15. Kushin, M. J., & Yamamoto, M. (2010). Did social media really matter? College students' use of online media and political decision making in the 2008 election. Mass Communication and Society, 13(5), 608-630.
16. Loader, B. D., & Mercea, D. (2011). Networking democracy? Social media innovations and participatory politics. Information, Communication & Society, 14(6), 757-769.
17. Nisbet, M. C., & Scheufele, D. A. (2004). Political talk as a catalyst for online citizenship. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 81(4), 877-896.
18. Norris, P. (2001). Digital Divide? Civic Engagement, Information Poverty and The Internet In Democratic Societies. Cambridge University Press.
19. Putnam, R. (1995). “Bowling alone: America‘s declining social capital”, Journal of Democracy, 6, 65-78
20. Scheufele, D. A. (2002). Examining differential gains from mass media and their implications for participatory behavior. Communication Research, 29(1), 46-65.
21. Schudson, M. (1997). Why conversation is not the soul of democracy. Critical Studies in Media Communication, 14(4), 297-309.
22. Shah, D. V., Cho, J., Nah, S., Gotlieb, M. R., Hwang, H., Lee, N. J., ... & McLeod, D. M. (2007). Campaign ads, online messaging, and participation: Extending the communication mediation model. Journal of communication, 57(4), 676-703.
23. Verba, S., Schlozman, K. L., & Brady, H. E. (1995). Voice and equality: Civic voluntarism in American politics. Harvard University Press.
24. Yamamoto, M., Kushin, M. J., & Dalisay, F. (2013). Social media and mobiles as political mobilization forces for young adults: Examining the moderating role of online political expression in political participation. New Media & Society, 1461444813518390.
25. Yang, H. C., & DeHart, J. L. (2016). Social media use and online political participation among college students during the US election 2012. Social Media+ Society, 2(1), 2056305115623802.
26. Tenenhaus, M., Vinzi, V. E., Chatelin, Y. M., & Lauro, C. (2005). PLS path modeling. Computational statistics & data analysis, 48(1), 159-205.
27. Baron, R. M., and D. A. Kenny. (1986). The moderator-mediator variabledistinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic and statisticalconsiderations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51 (6): 1173–1182.
Send email to the article author

Add your comments about this article
Your username or Email:

CAPTCHA


XML   Persian Abstract   Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

rahbarghazi M, motamedi S, shahriyari A. The relationship between social networks and political participation with an emphasis on the role of mediator of political debate, political efficacy and political culture. scds 2017; 6 (2) :127-149
URL: http://journals.sabz.ac.ir/scds/article-1-424-en.html


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Volume 6, Issue 2 (11-2017) Back to browse issues page
مجله علمی پژوهشی مطالعات توسعه اجتماعی فرهنگی Quarterly Journal of Socio - Cultural Development Studies
Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.04 seconds with 37 queries by YEKTAWEB 4645