[Home ] [Archive]   [ فارسی ]  
:: Main :: About :: Current Issue :: Archive :: Search :: Submit :: Contact ::
Main Menu
Journal Information::
Articles archive::
For Authors::
For Reviewers::
Contact us::
Site Facilities::
Search in website

Advanced Search
Receive site information
Enter your Email in the following box to receive the site news and information.
:: Volume 5, Issue 1 (8-2016) ::
scds 2016, 5(1): 147-174 Back to browse issues page
Analysis of the spatial distribution of social services and welfare Utilizes the VIKOR FUZZY Technique (Case Study: Counties Khorasan Razavi Province)
Yaghoub Zarei
Abstract:   (6732 Views)

This study was conducted with the aim of analysis and classification development of social services and  welfare in Counties of Khorasan Razavi province. This research is Basic and methods it has been used in the descriptive analysis. Statistical population Counteies of Khorasan Razavi Province and collecting method Information from the type of library entrance, and collected according to the research objectives of forms based on data tables and Statisticsin 2011, During which 19 files Welfare indicators extracted and slightly way by using Fuzzy Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solutionand was performed using SPSS software Level of development Counties of KhorasanRazavi province. The findings of this study describes unbalanced aspect of health field, Shows existence of a deep gap region in Khorasan Razavi province. So that the distribution and population access clients each County welfare services, Show that the only counties Gonabad, TorbatHeydarieh and Neyshabour have acceptable level of development and in other Counties ratio distribution facilities to distribution of the population covered it is unacceptable and deplorable. As far as that more than half of the Counties of Khorasan Razavi were subjected in the category of deprived areas in field of access to facilities and welfare services

Keywords: Khorasan Razavi Province, Development, Social Services and Welfare
Full-Text [PDF 980 kb]   (1378 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research | Subject: General
Received: 2016/07/5 | Accepted: 2017/05/7 | Published: 2017/05/7
1. Barton. H and Tsourou, C. (2000). Healthy Urban Planning. London: Spon Press; 1-200.
2. Braveman. P and Tarimo, E. (2002). Social inequalities in health within countries: not only an issue for afuent nations. Social Science & Medicine; 54(11):1621–1635.
3. Brown, G and Bramstion, P. (1996). Quality of life in the families of young people with intellectual disabilities. Journal of Mental Health nurse; 5(3): 120-130.
4. Carson J. (2011). Components social support and Quality of life in severely ill, low income individuals and general population group. Community Mental Health Journal; 34(5):459-75.
5. Chen, L.Y and Wang, T.C. (2009). Optimizing partner's choice in IS/IT out sourcing projects: the strategic decision of Fuzzy VIKOR. International Journal of Production Economics; 20(1): 232-242.
6. Chu, MT., Shyu, J., Tzeng. G. H and Khosla, R. (2007). Comparison among three analytical methods for knowledge communities group-decision analysis. Expert Systems with Applications; 33(4): 1011–1024.
7. Fanga, P., Donga, S., Xiaoc, J., Liud, C., Fengc, X and Wang, Y. (2010). Regional inequality in health and its determinants: Evidence from China. Health Policy; 94(1):14–25.
8. Keyes, C. L. M. (1998). Social well-being. Social Psychology Quarterly; 61(2): 121-140.
9. Keyes, C. L. M. (2002). The mental health continuum: From languishing to flourishing in life. Journal of Health and Social Research ;43(2): 207-222.
10. Keyes, C. L. M. (2003). Complete mental health: An agenda for the 21st century. Washington, American Psychological Association.
11. Keyes, C. L. M. (2004).The nexus of cardiovascular disease and depression revisited: The complete mental health perspective and the moderating role of age and gender. Aging and Mental Health; 8(3): 266-274.
12. Keyes, C. L. M. (2005). Mental illness and or mental health? Investigating axioms of the complete state Model of Health. Journal of Consoling and Clinical Psychology;73(3): 539-548.
13. Kober, R. (2010). Enhancing the quality of life of People with intellectual disabilities. From Theory to Practice (Social Indicators Research Series). New York: Springer press.
14. Larson, J. S. (1996). The World Health Organizations definition of health: Social versus spiritual health. Social Indicators Research; 38(2): 181-92.
15. Li. X and Reeves, G. A. (1999). Multiple Criteria Approach to Data Envelopment Analysis. European Journal of Operational Research;115(3): 507- 517.
16. Malczewski, J. (1999). GIS and Multicriteria Decision Analysis. USA: John Wiley & Sons; 1-392.
17. Maynard, A and McDaid. D. (2003). Evaluating health interventions: exploiting the potential. Health policy; 63(2): 215-226.
18. Meng, Z., Wan, H., Qiu, B. & Shang, L. (2010). Relative entropy evaluation method for multiple attribute decision making. School of Economics and Management, Beihang University, Beijing
19. Opricovic. S and Tzeng. GH. (2004). Compromise solution by MCDM methods: A comparative analysis of VIKOR and TOPSIS. European Journal of Operational Research; 156(2): 445-455.
20. Rao, R.V. (2008). A decision making methodology for material selection using an improved compromise ranking method. Materials and Design;29(10): 1949-1954.
21. Schirnding. Y. (2002). Health and sustainable development:can we rise to the challenge? Lancet; 360(9333): 632-637.
22. Smith. HK., Harper. PR., Potts. CN and Thyle, A. (2009). Planning sustainable community health schemes in rural areas of developing countries. European Journal of Operational Research; 193(3):768–777.
23. Thiagarasu, V and Rengaraj, V. (2015). A MADM Model with VIKOR Method for Decision Making Support Systems, International Journal of Novel Research in Computer Science and Software Engineering, 2(1):63-81.
24. Wei. J, Xiangyi. L. (2008). The Multiple Attribute Decision- Making VIKOR Method and Its Application. 4th International Conference Wireless Communications, Networking and Mobile Computing 2008. Chain: WICOM.
25. Xia. HC., Li. DF., Zhou. J and Wang. J.M. (2006). Fuzzy Linmap Method for Multi-Attribute Decision Making under Fuzzy Environments. Journal of Computer and System Science; 72(4): 741-759.
Send email to the article author

Add your comments about this article
Your username or Email:


XML   Persian Abstract   Print

Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

zarei Y. Analysis of the spatial distribution of social services and welfare Utilizes the VIKOR FUZZY Technique (Case Study: Counties Khorasan Razavi Province). scds 2016; 5 (1) :147-174
URL: http://journals.sabz.ac.ir/scds/article-1-305-en.html

Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Volume 5, Issue 1 (8-2016) Back to browse issues page
مجله علمی پژوهشی مطالعات توسعه اجتماعی فرهنگی Quarterly Journal of Socio - Cultural Development Studies
Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.06 seconds with 37 queries by YEKTAWEB 4642