---

In this study, the researcher attempted to addresses the relationships within the family from the perspective of relationships between two generations: old women, and young women. What discourses are subject to these relationships and are these discourses close together or considered as obvious sign of the gap between the two generations? The method used by researcher was taking advantage of the qualitative approach, based on an analysis of the position as one of the way of Grounded Theory method and used narrative interviews. Purposefully sample was chosen to the number 20 cases of Tehran citizens . Findings of research showed that the relations among two generations of women in Iranian families is convergent. While there is difference between the traditionalism discourse of elders and forerunner young people. But all two come together in the discourse, which is modernism discourse. And while family has differences, is not in the way of generational threat and still family is an important issue and priority of generations.
  

---

The fundamental changes during the last few decades have resulted in a variety of concepts and perspectives about the family. The present study provides a summary of the theories in the form of naturalist and constructivist by reviewing and detailing the theories. This study also clarifies the conflict over the position of the family and its future, as well as the theoretical logic of the current analyses in a more general horizon. In this study, the research layout is of a qualitative type and the theoretical approach of genealogy is conducted with a thematic analysis method and categorization technique.  The theoretical reading of the family under the naturalistic type has resulted in the advent of the continuity-rupture duality which has formulated the bipolar type of the family in crisis or the ideal family. Furthermore, the reading of the conceptual space of the family under the constructivist type has led to an unprecedented definition including different types of perceptions of the family. Based on the research findings the naturalistic type in family sociology has led to the formulation of the continuity-rupture theories. However, its alternative approach namely the constructionist type has enabled the possibility to encounter family changes, not in the sense of rupture, but as a lifestyle change. This study is of paramount importance due to passing the theories of rupture and considering new possibilities in the theoretical return to the family.

---

In reviewing the evolutions of sociological development in Iran, quantitative and qualitative changes have been considered as an important indicator in recognizing these developments. This paper, based on a generation approach, examines texts that have examined sociology in Iran. In the study of the meaning of sociology among generations, it is a question of how the approaches that have been studied in the past by sociology have and what have changed to date. Using content quality analysis methods, 186 written works have been reviewed and discussed specifically in sociology in Iran in the 70's and 80's. The dominant discourse on existing analyzes of sociology in Iran is developmental discourse with a pathologic orientation. The third and fourth generations see sociology as serving national development and solving social problems. But the new generation brings less prominence to politics and has a more tendency towards history and qualitative approaches in the study of sociology in Iran.