[Home ] [Archive]   [ فارسی ]  
:: Main :: About :: Current Issue :: Archive :: Search :: Submit :: Contact ::
:: Volume 8, Issue 4 (4-2020) ::
scds 2020, 8(4): 181-209 Back to browse issues page
Provide a causal model of higher education performance in the context of the Corona Crisis based on social responsibility and the quality of e-learning
Sima Alipour, Abbas Sabet , Ardalan Feili
Apadana Institute of Higher Education
Abstract:   (328 Views)
The present study is applied in terms of purpose and in terms of how to collect data, it is a descriptive research of correlational type. The statistical population of the study is 430 teachers of Apadana Higher Education Institute in 2020; Of these, 203 people were selected based on Cochranchr(chr('39')39chr('39'))s formula by simple random sampling. Data collection tools are Carroll Social Responsibility Questionnaire (1991), Akbari E-Learning Quality Questionnaire (2012) and a researcher-made questionnaire on the performance of higher education in the Corona crisis.The validity of the questionnaire was confirmed by convergence and content and the reliability of the questionnaire was confirmed using Cronbachchr(chr('39')39chr('39'))s alpha coefficient. SPSS 25 software was used for data analysis in the inferential section and LISREL 8.8 software was used for path analysis. Model fit indices such as GFI, RMSEA and X2 / df were equal to 0.96, 0.08 and 2.21, respectively, which indicate a very good fit of the model in the statistical population of the research.
Keywords: Corona Crisis, Higher Education, University Social Responsibility, E-learning
Full-Text [PDF 638 kb]   (77 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research | Subject: General
Received: 2020/08/28 | Accepted: 2020/04/29 | Published: 2020/04/29
27. Al-Khoury, P., Bolkart, K., Fechter, I. M., & AlShamali, M. (2015). students social responsibility initiatives and impact on university performance: an empirical study from Lebanon. Business Education & Accreditation, 7(2), 75-87.
28. Alzyoud, S. A., & Bani-Hani, K. (2015). Social responsibility in higher education institutions: application case from the Middle East. European Scientific Journal, 11(8).
29. Asadi, A. & Karimi, A. (2007). Reexamining Effective Constructs on the Application of Information Technology (IT) by Trainers in Applied and Scientific Training Centers. Iran Agricultural Sciences Magazine, (2), 38-2.
30. Cao,J, (2005). Learning With Virtual Mentors: How To make E-Learning Interactive and Effective? Available At: http:// proquest.umi.com.
31. Carroll, A.B. (2000). Ethical challenges for business in the new millennium: Corporate social responsibility and models of management morality, Business Ethics Quarterly. 10(1), 33-42. [DOI:10.2307/3857692]
32. Cooper, R. (2004). E-learning in the world. London: Falmer.
33. Crawford, J., Butler-Henderson, K., Rudolph, J., & Glowatz, M. (2020). COVID-19: 20 Countries' Higher Education Intra-Period Digital Pedagogy Responses. Journal of Applied Teaching and Learning (JALT), 3(1). [DOI:10.37074/jalt.2020.3.1.7]
34. Doane, D., (2005), Beyond corporate social responsibility: minnows, mammoths and markets, Futures, 37, 215-229. [DOI:10.1016/j.futures.2004.03.028]
35. European Commission (2001). Promoting a European Framework for Corporate Social Responsibility, Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Brussels.
36. Font, X., Guix, M. & Bonilla-Priego, M. J. (2016). Corporate Social Responsibility In Cruising: Using Materiality Analysis to Create Shared Value. Tourism Management, 53, 175-186. [DOI:10.1016/j.tourman.2015.10.007]
37. Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error: Algebra and statistics. Journal of marketing research,18(3), 382-388. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800313 [DOI:10.2307/3150980]
38. Gholami.,& Zarei,A. (2011) Virtual education in Iran's higher education: Faculty's reflection on the application of Web 2.0 tools in University of Kurdistan. Full paper presented and publishe d in the proceedings of ED Media, Lisbon, Portugal (June 27 July 1).
39. Gourova, E., Todorova, Y., & Gourov, N., (2009). Skills for Future Engineers: Challenges for Universities in Bulgaria, WSEAS Transactions on Business and Economics, 6(7), 385-399.
40. Hongwei, H., & Lloyd, H. (2020). The impact of Covid-19 pandemic on corporate social responsibility and marketing philosophy. Journal of Business Research 116 (2020); 176-182. [DOI:10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.05.030]
41. Jasbi Abdullah, (2009). Principles and fundamentals of management, Tehran, islamic azad university, Research Assistant, Office of Technology Development.
42. Johnes, J. and Taylor, J. (1990). Performance Indicators in Higher Education: Buckingham The Society for Research into Higher Education & Open University, Buckingham.
43. Karanjam, S. S., Zarif Sanaiey, N., & Karanjam, S. (2017). Designing a comprehensive organizational e-learning model using the meta-synthesis method. Interdiscip J Virtual Learn Med Sci, 8(3). [DOI:10.5812/ijvlms.11496]
44. Kline, R. B. (2015). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. Guilford publications.
45. Lanenburg, F. C. and A. C Ornstein (2004). Educational Administration, Concepts and Practices, Wadsworth Publishing Compaining.
46. Lim PC, Tang NK. A study of patients' expectations and satisfaction in Singapore hospitals. Int J Health Care Qual Assur Inc Leadersh Health Serv. 2000, 13(7), 290-9. [DOI:10.1108/09526860010378735]
47. Iivari, N., Sharma, S., & Ventä-Olkkonen, L. (2020). Digital transformation of everyday life-How COVID-19 pandemic transformed the basic education of the young generation and why information management research should care?. International Journal of Information Management, 102-183. [DOI:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2020.102183]
48. Means, B., & Olson, K. (2006). Technologies role in education reform findings from a national study of innovating. Educational Technology &Society, 12(4), 228-240.
49. Mehta S, Kalra M. Information and communication technologies: A bridge for social equity and sustainable development in India. Int Inf Lib Rev. 2006, 38(3), 147-60. [DOI:10.1080/10572317.2006.10762716]
50. Moore, M. G., & Kearsley, G. (2011). Distance education: A systems view of online learning. Cengage Learning.
51. NDONG, M. (2008). Social responsibility of the university: Researchers are noting shortcomings, Retrieved from http://www.ernwaca.org/web/spip.php? article146 - OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises (2008). from:www.oecd.org/dataoecd/56/36/1922428.pdf
52. Pollock, Neil & Cornford, M. (2001). Theory and Practice of the Virtual University Working through the Work of Making Work Mobile. Availableat: http: //weber. Ucsd. Edu /~gbowker / pubs.htm.
53. Santos, G., Marques, C. S., Justino, E., & Mendes, L. (2020). Understanding social responsibility's influence on service quality and student satisfaction in higher education. Journal of Cleaner Production, 256, 120-597. [DOI:10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120597]
54. Siemens, G. (2013). Learning analytics: The emergence of a discipline. American Behavioral Scientist, 57(10), 1380-1400. [DOI:10.1177/0002764213498851]
55. Snider.J., Hill.R.P. & Martin.D., (2003). Corporate Social Responsibility in the 21st Century: A View from the World's Most Successful Firms, Journal of Business Ethics. 48, 175-187. [DOI:10.1023/B:BUSI.0000004606.29523.db]
56. Stewart, B. L. (2004). Online learning: a strategy for social responsibility in educational access. The Internet and Higher Education, 7(4), 299-310. [DOI:10.1016/j.iheduc.2004.09.003]
57. Yaron, G. (2017). Online Learning in Higher Education. Publisher: Nova Science Publishers.
58. Yazdanpanah A. The assessment of competency indicators in virtual University. Strateg Manag Stud. 2012, 12(3), 101-22.
59. https://www.irna.ir/news/83713880/%DA%A9%D8%B1%D9%88%D9%86%D8%A7-%D9%88-%DA%86%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%B4-%D9%85%D8%B3%D8%A6%D9%88%D9%84%DB%8C%D8%AA-%D9%BE%D8%B0%DB%8C%D8%B1%DB%8C-%D8%A7%D8%AC%D8%AA%D9%85%D8%A7%D8%B9%DB%8C
60. https://www.topuniversities.com/student-info/health-support/coronavirus-advice-qs-event-attendees.
61. 56. Wang, C.J., Ng, C.Y., Brook, R.H., 2020. Response to COVID-19 in Taiwan: big data analytics, new technology, and proactive testing. JAMA 323 (14): 1341–1342.
62. 48. Mishra, L., Gupta, T., & Shree, A. (2020). Online teaching-learning in higher education during lockdown period of COVID-19 pandemic. International Journal of Educational Research Open, 1, 100012.
63. 45. Mailizar, M., Almanthari, A., Maulina, S., Bruce, S., 2020. Secondary school mathematics teachers’ views on E-learning implementation barriers during the COVID-19 pandemic: the case of Indonesia. Eurasia J. Math. Sci. Technol. Educ. 16 (7): em186.
Send email to the article author

Add your comments about this article
Your username or Email:


XML   Persian Abstract   Print

Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Alipour S, Sabet A, Feili A. Provide a causal model of higher education performance in the context of the Corona Crisis based on social responsibility and the quality of e-learning. scds. 2020; 8 (4) :181-209
URL: http://journals.sabz.ac.ir/scds/article-1-1203-en.html

Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Volume 8, Issue 4 (4-2020) Back to browse issues page
مجله علمی پژوهشی مطالعات توسعه اجتماعی فرهنگی Quarterly Journal of Socio - Cultural Development Studies
Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.03 seconds with 30 queries by YEKTAWEB 4331